MST. SHAHIN versus THE STATE
Section (c) Testimony of Evidence The witnesses made permanent statements on material points, the accused was arrested on the spot and it was proved that he was traveling in the alleged car. The prosecution did not produce any evidence. The accused was the owner of the charisma, and the opium recovered from the car played the most role, and the original owner was not arrested by the police High Court while maintaining the conviction of the accused, from death to life imprisonment. I failed to prosecute. His presence in the vehicle of the three, which was regularly described, was not enough to prove that his involvement in the case was sufficient to prove that the prosecution had succeeded in prosecuting both women and the two women. The case against him was set aside and he was acquitted of the charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Talamba lawyer
