Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHMAD versus NATHU KHAN

O XVII, R 3 Specific Relief Act (I of 18.77), section 12 suit, closure of evidence and exclusion of case for specific performance of land sale contract, after listing the witnesses list by the plaintiff. , The presiding officer was on leave, and the case was adjourned, but the postponement date of the hearing, the plaintiff could not present the evidence, after the presiding officer was on leave to record the evidence of the case. Given three opportunities to present evidence, but the plaintiff failed to present the same plaintiff the last opportunity to present evidence, but at that date the plaintiff neither the court Neither appeared nor could have presented any evidence, and his lawyer, who was present in the court, requested the adjournment without disclosing any reason. The plaintiff cannot allege that he was not allowed a reasonable and fair opportunity to produce it. The plaintiff's evidence, as stated, could not prove that his brother had died on the last date of hearing, htly closed and his suit was rightly dismissed. top advocates from Babri Banda lawyer