Find a Lawyer

MURAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM

The superior right to sue for pre-occupation of section 13 & pre-occupation cannot be used until termination of non-performance claims by a former umpire hearing of a plaintiff's sale of land But did not have the function of seeking immediately. In all cases, they had to prove that they had made such a claim before filing a pre-emption suit. If the plaintiff fails to do so, in the present case, the person providing information on the sale of the suit land. Will be extinguished. Not presented by the plaintiff, the statements of the witnesses presented by the plaintiff indicate that the plaintiff did not state on the knowledge of the sale of the suit land that he would exercise his superior right to the former discrimination. , The plaintiff's general attorney who also appeared as the defendant's witness. The plaintiff did not say anything in his statement about the declaration of a superior right of self-determination before the trial; in the circumstances, it was rightly found that the plaintiff had failed. The trial court, pending the trial under section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, rejected the claim filed by the plaintiff in proving the petition. immigration advocates contact from Mehmood Kot lawyer