Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR

Sections 42 and 54 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 4 of the Evidence (Article 10 of 1984) Article 100 suit that is for declaration and transfer of immovable property, the plaintiff's evidence asserts that the suit land. The original owner of half of the sale was allegedly in favor of the part of his estate through the registered sales deeds executed in his favor by the original owner and that the defendants who were the successors of the deceased owner Interrupting their possession, the two courts ruled under the lawsuit that the plaintiff's entire claim is registered on unregistered cell deed. He was allegedly hanged by the original owner of the land eleven years before his death, while confirming the change of inheritance in favor of the defendant who succeeded the deceased owner, only four months before the death of the landowner. Was made in favor of which there was no evidence to prove it. The alleged owner of the sale of the land was the alleged land suit of the land, no attempt was made by the plaintiffs to establish an alliance between the sale of the deed and the land, the claimant claimed that the suit was still alive. None of the plaintiffs / alleged shopkeepers entered the prosecution to prove their sale and their failure to enter the witnesses. The box was deadly / the suit landowner's seller survived for nearly eleven years after the alleged sale process, but the plaintiff / alleged shopkeeper could not explain why the sale was allegedly lifelong. Revenue not included in record. The shopkeepers below are on Article 100 of the Conan Evidence, 1984 us immigration advocates from Kashmore lawyer