NAWAB MASROOR ALI KHAN versus SAID AKBAR
Section 202 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit for specific performance of the contract was issued a permit for the allotment of alternative land to be dismissed by Islamabad Capital, an agreement was reached with the claimant, the amount from which Received, and executed a common force. According to the terms of the agreement, the plaintiff was allotted in favor of the defendant and the property rights were transferred to the plaintiff instead of transferring the land to the plaintiff, to the other person, the plaintiff sued for specific performance of the contract. And the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff based on the terms of the defendant's agreement and the general power of attorney, but the appellate court reversed the contractual suit between the parties because It was for sale of a permit issued by the Authority for allotment. The alternative land plaintiff, in whose favor the General Power of Attorney was acted upon by the defendant, considered that the case for the first case was that of an agency that had entered into a contract with the Interest Act, 1872 The agency was made non-refundable under section 202; the appellate court did not read the entire evidence on record by reversing the trial and adjudication and failed to speak on other matters simply because the contract was void. Useless decisions had been made and the appellate court's order was revoked and in the light of the evidence on record, The remand for re-judgment was obtained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Pishin lawyer