Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

The unlawful occupation of the State on Sections 32 and 34 ordered the Collector to withdraw the petitioner from being a Commissioner of Inquiries, dismissing the petitioner's petition that the applicant's position was that he had disputed the land controversially. The house was built and therefore they reside there, the perusal record under the Board of Revenue under the Punjab Policy Letters of Proprietary Rights, 1988 and 1993 was declared that the applicant had acquired the state land. Were illegally violated, which was allotted to the Department of Education for the establishment of a school petitioner, Couldn't do it The allotment order in his favor was an order issued by the applicant as a competent authority, which could not be allowed to retain the land in question, was ordered to expel the applicant properly and thereby There was no injustice. The Board of Revenue dismissed the request for review. Under the circumstances lawer from fb area from Gojra lawyer