Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ALI HAIDER versus GHULAM QASIM


Section 163 and 164 exclude the request for review by the Commissioner on the ground that he was not eligible to review his predecessor's order without the prior approval of the Board of Revenue, on the basis of the invalidity of the valid request, the officer to whom Attempts to revise the order were moved, the Commissioner should have exercised his / her right to the facts of the case, while dealing with the request for review, and if they were of the opinion that this was a valid case to review, The board should have filed a reference. Revenue accepted the review request with approval to allow the Board of Revenue to review, remanding the Executive District Officer (Revenue) for a reappraisal request decision, setting aside the pending order.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Daska lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.