THE STATE versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Sections 24 and 30 (2) General Colony Condition, 1938, CL9 Allotment did not apply industry, complained to the Board of Revenue for canceling the sale of land allotted on this land, after the last 15 years. The Violative Complainant regarding the allotment did not contest the installation. The factory now had a common misconception on the site that no action could be taken by the district collector, where the action was taken under the jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue Parameters under section () (1) of the Act, in which case the District Collector No action was taken by the source. It has been stated that there was no case of fraud, concealment or disqualification against Altiz. The lawsuit was based on a breach of the terms and conditions of the lease's approval, for which the district collector was able to take action against Allies, under Article 9 of the General Colony. 1938
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Qazi Ahmed lawyer
