Find a Lawyer

FAZAL DIN versus ZULFIQAR ALI

Section 19 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 164 The transfer of allotments obtained through fraud and fraud was allotted to the petitioner's (allotment) in 1950, manipulation of Revenue Record entries. Respondents' predictions by many in many cases. The name was moved and the request for correction of such entries was rejected by the District Collector's Commissioner, whereby the Revenue Record entry in the circle was written. The boyfriends court proceeded mechanically without responding. In his mind on the facts and matters of the Commissioner the Commissioner did not discuss manipulation in the visible allotment order; the writings and records were interrupted in different ink, by the Assistant Commissioner-certified Revenue Staff. This was not discussed in your order report. District collector failed to speak to Apple was kept on record by the applicants in the Colony Office, and the documents available at the Colony Office clearly show that many of the cases in this case were renamed to the predecessor. An attempt was made. The original allotment of the respondents through fraud and fraud was made in 1950 by the District Collector in favor of 4 applicants, which must be restored in his name is his real allotment by his Board of Revenue. Accepting the request for review, put aside the ugly effective orders. While the subsequent orders were approved on the basis of fraud, they were without legal basis and set aside. female advocates from Kech lawyer