Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ABDULLAH

The auction of land auction applicants in Articles 32 and 34 of the unlawful possession of the applicants admits that they were not given notice of the auction nor given proper advertisement. And that they were ready for an offer of Rs 18,000 because legally, instead of identifying a national daily advertisement of a large number of property auctions, including legitimate land disputes over the highest bid of Rs 11,500. On the ad, details about the measles property were about to be auctioned. The auction was held at fixed place on the date indicated in the advertisement, the applicant was not required to personally issue any notice as the advertisement was fulfilled by the advertisement in the National Daily Bid sheet. That the auction was contested between three. Subsequent offers were not benefited by the higher bids offered to those who offered different bids ranging from Rs. 6,100 to Rs. 11,500, who sought to thwart the auction process. To extend their illegal occupation of the land. Removed to interfere with controversial land auction proceedings in favor of highest bidder BOARD advocate from Jhang lawyer