WALI MUHAMMAD versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN
West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 164 Obtaining Land on Tertiary Non-payment of Appropriation Amount The applicant had requested the Collector that the respondent, who had obtained the land on it, did not pay the consignment for two years. The applicants claimed that the applicants claimed that without issue, the basic issue and their order did not indicate that the basis on which they filed the order against the collector's order was calculated. Based on this, the Additional Commissioner accepted that the applicant had received the disputed amount through someone, but the name Not to mention that the person's Additional Commissioner did not take the matter in its proper perspective as it was a matter of constipation and not the Collector's approval of the landlord and tenant relationship which was a badly worded order. The order passed by both the collector and the Additional Commissioner in the proper context of the appeal was not decided by the Additional Commissioner, which was arbitrarily approved and the collector's results were based on any credible and admissible evidence. Was set aside and the matter was already sought by the law for remand.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Washuk lawyer