Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Admission of section 40, 41, 42, 52, 163 and 164 of the Bond of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 should not be changed on the basis of any mistake or fraud, either on clear clerical error or on patent fact. Defamation was supported by constructive and physical occupation of the community, certainly not open to changes at any time through the review process giving the impression that any admission had a long standing role. The same should be considered when determining the time for the variable collector to self-assess. If, at any time, the power of the reviewer had to be exercised, it should be satisfied that the entries were not long and did not deny the facts of the possession and did not require detailed evidence and requested Could not be passed by order passed through the backs of the operators. As the amending authority seeks to amend the existing registration for another 50 years list of supreme court advocates from Kotla lawyer