FATEH MUHAMMAD versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), BHAKKAR
Sections 19 and 30 were transferred after the transfer of the tenancy rights to the approval of the property rights and payment of public dues was refused by the district officer on the basis that such a matter was transferred to the transfer of property owned by the state. Was started to avoid the costs incurred. Rights / Registration Fees etc. There is no provision for exclusion of such a case under section 19 of the Law of Law, rejecting such prayer due to loss of government to the provision of section 19 of lawmakers. Will be ineffective. The Act is never intended to delay the transfer of the tenancy, transferring the rights of the tenant from the original tenant to the other person until the completion of all the terms and conditions of the scan, as per the Act. 19, after acquiring the proprietary rights under it. The tenancy government must transfer at the time of the contract's issuance The buyer must pay, before the tenants or their legal heirs, to acquire the proprietary rights, to execute the conveyance deed and then the tenancy rights to any registered work. Moving the source can defeat the purpose for which Section 19 of the Act was provided and may require the transfer of the tenant-related. At any stage after the declaration of eligibility for the acquisition of property rights / payment of any land value or at any stage after which he acquired the CT rights and from time to time interest on the tenancy. Then it was entitled to grant property rights. A special history board of revenue accepted the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kumbh lawyer