QASIR IQBAL versus CH. ASAD RAZA, RETURNING OFFICER, NA-38, RAWALPINDI
Sections 12 and d 4 (3) (d) deny the nomination papers and the second number of candidates not belonging to the constituency to whom the candidate intended to contest the election was in significant need of the law tender Section 12 of the People's Representation Act 1976 Was. The Returning Officer had no option but to select the proposer and the secondary candidate from where he intended to get the selection, but the nomination papers were rejected by the Representation Section 14 (3) of the Public Act. (d) Investigating under the provisions of (d), the defect for the proposer and the second constituency for which the candidate had submitted his nomination in 1976 could not be ignored nor the therapeutics. I was justified in naming the returning officer's nomination papers
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
