Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, MULTAN REGION, MULTAN

Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), section 114, O XXIII, RI and O XLVII, RI suits, in this suit, petitioned the plaintiff's declaration and order for removal of the injunction that the EDPCO sought for their Source established by law. Should not be disconnected or closed and that the defendant should be prevented from removing the VHF tower and the attached equipment while the plaintiff's statement that if the defendant does not remove the VHF tower and its associated equipment, he may return his case. Which the lawyer admitted. It was dismissed for the defendants and upon seeing such admission case, when the defendants filed a review petition against the trial court's decision alleging that the defendants engaged in a lawyer. Has no jurisdiction and no lawyer has been on the field on behalf of the other defendants; the trial court proceedings were not binding on him. Such a request was accepted and it was stated that the appeal against approval of the review petition was dismissed. Thi missed the appeal. The trial court did not decide the arguments about Ann Brits on the basis of the representation presented by the defendant's counsel, it was in the fitness of things that the orders of the agreement would be set aside under the orders of the courts. The suit will be considered pending before. The trial court, which will make its decision strictly in accordance with the law Pakistan, top advocate family court from Theing Jattan More lawyer