Find a Lawyer

AZAM ALI versus SIRAJ DIN

Article 42 & In 54 Islamic Law Inheritance Suit The original owner of the property who had two sons and two daughters died, the property he had to inherit was passed on to his sons and daughters because his legal heirs had no proof Didn't exist. The suit property was divided among the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff, who was the legal heir of one of the daughters of the deceased owner of the suit property, who himself claimed that he was the exclusive owner of the suit property. I could not offer a title deed. A copy of the 52-year-old 1951 review was recorded, stating that the suit property was the name of his mother, who was one of the deceased owner's daughters, who said that the legal heirs of one of the deceased owner's sons on the property suit. Claimed this ownership. Because his grandfather owned the property, he could not be claimed, the trial court denied the plaintiff in this case. He would not present any title document in favor of his deceased mother, but the appellate court rejected the trial court's finding and accepted the plaintiffs' claims on the basis of assessment for 1951, and it was admitted among the 52 parties. In the interests of the predecessor was the owner of the property in dispute, no party can claim exclusive ownership of the property for the year 1951: relied upon by the 52 plaintiffs, the title deed was not decided and approved by the appellate court below. It was amended to declare that the parents are joint owners of the suit property and that the parties seek their remedy. Can reach Distribution of suit property by law law websites from Jamshoro lawyer