Find a Lawyer

STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, SINDH versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR

The appreciation of the Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 evidence was found to be strong enough to support the Molecular Evidence Prosecution case that the plaintiff's prosecution witnesses had in some words blatantly stated and extensively examined all the prosecution witnesses. There was no contradiction in what was done. Their evidence shows no reason to reject their testimony. The version of the witnesses was proved by the evidence of recovery of blood-stained land and the presence of corpses, which the investigating officer filed shortly after filing an FIR. The testimony of the witnesses was further supported by medical assistance. The death by the medical officer, who performed the post-mortem examination of the bodies, also approved the prosecution's story under which witnesses' testimony was confirmed, the same day the magistrate's principle of recording a confession Recorded without violation, it seems voluntary and true. It may be that he fully accepted the judicial confession, unless a prescription for his creator's pardon was presented, so that the confessional statement could not be misconstrued as the prosecution's witnesses testified before it. There was no doubt that the suspects were seen at the time of the incident. The judicial confession was true on the facts of the conviction and there was no reasonable basis for the refusal of the crime and the recovery of the gun, as no report of the Ballistic Expert was put on record, according to the Chemical Examiner's report. The matter was supported. Judicial confession also proved to be a crime recorded by the trial court against the accused, best advocate from Abdul Hakim lawyer