Find a Lawyer

NADIR KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 342, 364 (2) and 537 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 364A and 377 of the Offense (Enforcement Hodg's Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 12 Anti-Terrorism Act) (XXVII of 1997), the section state statement under section 2342, the CCP did not show the trial judge's certificate of record that the statements of the defendants under section 2342, CRPC, were not in their hands, which was section 6464 (( 2), was declared compulsory under the Cr., PC under section that37ect and was not defective, recording its statement under CRPC Section 2342, CCPC. The person in front of the accused Should be kept, no questions were kept about the chemical analyst's report, along with medical evidence. The statement under the age-related column of the accused was not assigned, according to the trial court, who had shown that the trial court had taken into account the strange facts of the trial court and the circumstances of the case. No queries were asked, they were set aside and the trial court remanded for action. Were shipped. The same is true of the statement of the accused under Section 342, CR PC, as per law. lawer from fb area from Mubarik Pur lawyer