Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. ZOHRA versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 mandamus petitioner wrote in his constitutional petition urging the respondents (government workers) from entering his house and banning him or his family from torturing and harassing them. It was further prayed that the defendants do not exceed the limit. In the course of performing his duties, the respondents denied going to the applicant's house or raiding that the applicant had requested that he be satisfied if the issue of his application was dealt with in this matter. If the defendants will act in accordance with the law and do not cause it while paying their duties. Any constitutional application for harassment was dealt with by the same observation that the applicant may request the jurisdiction of the competent court to settle his complaint for compensation claim.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Cherat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.