Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN versus AHMED IBRAHIM

Denial of complaint under Section 406/409/109/34 of Section 406/409/109/34, Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 200, 202, 203 and 204 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860) After the accused filed a complaint against the court under PPC section 200, CRPC ordered action against the two accused under section 204, CRPC, but under section 203, CRPC. The complaint against the third accused was dismissed, though it was named in the complaint, the trial court passed the order without recording the evidence under Article 202, in the initial phase of the CCP accused inquiry, in the proceedings authorized by the trial court. There was no locus standi to participate, which was a violation of the law allowing the accused to take part in the proceedings; the procedure for dealing with the complaint was that the court acknowledged the complaint when it was received. After conducting the crime and examining the complainant after the oath, if he is satisfied that the first case has come up, he has proceeded against the accused under Section 204, CRPC. The court found that none of the first cases had come up, the court could dismiss the complaint under section 203, the CCPC's preliminary inquiry can only be ordered when the court records the complainant's statement after the oath. After considering it as a necessary court, if it is satisfied after the inquiry that the first case against the accused was presented, it can proceed otherwise it will dismiss the complaint, considering the matter on the complaint by the court. Only satisfaction was required and it was not necessary for the court to order an inquiry under Section 202, CR PC Courts. , Usually the beginning property advocate from Ratto Dero lawyer