Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus THE STATE

Section 302/395/459/411 Legal Law Evidence Order (10 of 1984), Article 22 Identity Parade Test Identification of the parade was not available on the trial court record when the complainant was identified during the deployment of the parade ? Two months after the incident, records of which showed that none of the accused's prosecution witnesses had picked up or identified their character during the incident, so that they did not. Was raised or not explained. Who was shot alone on the dead record of the proceedings, and the caretaker magistrate testified to the fact that an accused had raised objections to the caretaker magistrate that the police had shown the witnesses before the arrest. The process of identifying the parade was legal and forbidden because the complainant clearly stated that the two polic IDs were present with the E-Official Magistrate during the parade, the process of identification cannot be relied upon. divorce advocates from Khair Pur Mir lawyer