Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD. versus ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Articles 18, 22 (1), 7 (2) and 21 of the Ordinance 1997 (IX of 1908), Article 181 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) , Article 48 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application 30 198 1981 The order for restriction was approved 30 ution 1981 The petition for execution was filed on 30 1997 1997 The Executive Court made such request. Excluded because the time restriction was followed by a ban in which another application was filed and mentioned, but not details about the history and decision of the institution. It was submitted to the Court that it was assumed that the first application was filed within the time fixed by law, which lasted for a period of three years from the order and the second application for its implementation was restricted to the Act. Was not fixed by 1908. But as suggested by the provisions of section 48, CPC 48, the CPC forbade the court from implementing the order on any fresh application submitted to the court. After the expiry of six years from the order, it should be tried. The current implementation request came under the purview of Section 48 (a), Section 22 (1) of the Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Financial Affairs) Act 1997. The limitation was abolished the Act of 1908 but not the provisions of section 48, CPC, under which section 7 (2) of the Banking Court Banking Companies (Recovery of loans, advances, credit and financial affairs) Act Will act In 1997, the High Court rejected the appeal for vacancy criminal advocate from Tharparkar lawyer