Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ versus THE STATE

Section 302/109/148/149 Definition of Evidence The seven accused were named in the FIR, but on the same set of evidence, the five accused were acquitted by the trial court, any overt act attributed to the co-accused. Hadn't been done, they had been right. Two hours after the incident, police were notified that a confrontation with the suspect was found between the ocular account and medical evidence. In addition to being a witness, the complainant was also the father of the deceased, leaving one of the two other eye witnesses. Was examined while the other who was examined was a relative. The deceased Investigation Officer admitted in his cross-examination that the first version of the accused was that he was not present at the scene of the incident, no vacancy was recovered from the spot, a case of prosecution against the gun exporting accused on the identification of the accused. Will not proceed. On suspicion of the suspect in the case, he was tried and convicted by the trial court, set aside and ordered that the e-resident co-accused could not prove that he was under sudden provocation. The victim was fired because the victim was disgraced and made a mocking joke with his sister. Such plea proved to be a misdemeanor because he did not present his sister in self-defense. The co-accused was not a minor at the time of the incident. The co-accused committed the murder of the accused, in the absence of any mitigating circumstances in favor of the co-accused, the trial The court convicted and sentenced the accused. how to become a advocate from Ranipur lawyer