Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the suit family court and the appellate court challenging the quantum of restitution for the accused / applicants in their constitutional petition. What was Stating that she was willing to pay restitution, she emphasized that the amount of restitution allowance by the courts was excessive, which should be reduced because the restitution allowance set by the courts was not excessive. This was determined after proper diagnosis, diagnosis and diagnosis. It was the duty of the Family Court to determine the amount of evidence available or to record the evidence available on the record relating to the sources of the defendant / applicant, with special jurisdiction to decide such matters. The jurisdiction of the High Court in the jurisdiction was not in accordance with these persons. The Appellate Court, the High Court, may declare that the family court has no legal authority nor the order to draw any legal conclusions, but as determined by the Family Court. By reducing the amount of restitution allowance, he could not make his decision to substitute family court in which Qan Weakness or legal circle error can not be identified. Two decisions were simultaneously passed by two courts to justify interference with the High Court's constitutional jurisdiction advocate from Chilas lawyer