Find a Lawyer

NASRULLAH JAN versus MST. MUMTAZ BEGUM

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 8 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 41 and 52 Revenue Record Value Recovery in Receipt of Occupation of immovable property by means of reliable oral and documentary evidence The evidence was proved that the evidence and the defendants failed to refute the entries whose name was in the Revenue Record they were in the name of the Plaintiff, whose defendant supported the evidence of the Revenue Authority in favor of the Plaintiff, recorded by the Defendants. The documentary evidence placed on it was not related to the present trial by the trial court It dismissed the claim that the plaintiff had failed to prove the defendant's request to include the defendant in the payment of his appeal to the appellant as Khakishura's tenant. The appellate court's finding of plaintiffs was merely, based on reasonable and reasonable definitions of evidence and law app. The High Court suffered cases related to misinterpretation of evidence or non-reading of evidence, the error or materiality of any jurisdiction. Irregularity is confirmed, which guarantees interference with the jurisdiction of the review. us immigration advocates from Muridkay lawyer