Find a Lawyer

WAZIR KHPL ALIAS WAZIR GUL versus NAWAB KHAN

The testimony of Section 2302 testimony witnesses made consistent, straightforward, and confidently inspiring statements about the incident and supported each other in material detail, did not record any hostility to show He was allegedly involved in the FIR. The contradiction between the medical evidence and the accounting account proved that in the presence of overwhelming evidence on record to link the accused to the prosecution, it was not necessary that the filing of the FIR was not delayed. That is, an unwanted witness from an independent and eligible area was examined and it was indicated that this was an unlawful incident, since it was repudiated because no independent witness from the local people was involved in other people's affairs. Will not knock the nose, the explanation offered by the accused is abusive and therefore not satisfactory. A. For a period of 8/9 years, the accused was a turning point, he pointed to his crime and confirmed the ocular testimony. The accused had killed an unarmed man in an unarmed manner, which came as a surprise at the time of the incident when the trial court sentenced the accused to death and appealed his dismissal. property advocates from Lasbela lawyer