NASRULLAH JAN versus MST. FARZANA BEGUM
West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Requirement of the House A personal fact review is practically available through the High Court: Article 199 of the Constitution The constitutional jurisdiction under the High Court does not sit as an appeal and cannot decide whether there is evidence to reach a conclusion through the lower forum and not to go into the merits of any matter in this case. Yes, it is needed again and, it is not necessary to review the evidence on the question of personal need ? The Landlord High Court cannot, by exercising its constitutional jurisdiction, disturb the unanimous finding of the facts listed on the re-examination of evidence by the courts unless it is shown that the courts have presented the evidence inaccurately. Or appreciation of the evidence because after the refreshment, the evidence can come to a different conclusion. There is no scope for the controller as well as the exclusion orders approved by the appellate court to be listed by the courts. The appellate court was neither unlawful nor disturbed to uphold the unitary finding of facts. Crooked court refused to intervene in order approved by the courts under the requests.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Khanbel lawyer