Find a Lawyer

JANA GUL versus THE STATE

The definition of material contained in Section 9 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Control of Drugs Act 1997, proved that the accused was arrested by a police officer on a railway platform and 1900 grams of hashish Was exported from a ton of ghee. The allegations made by the accused failed to produce anything on the record to prove that Charis had banned him because he refused to owe police officers, prosecutors' witnesses said. The details were fully supported by the prosecution's case and nothing could be benefited by them. Compliance with the mandatory provisions of section 103, CRPC was not fatal to the issue because 533 of the cases under the Code of Conduct Act 1997 under the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, excluded the CCPC's application. had gone. The police officer deposited the duties of the complainant, the investigating officer and his witness in the event which declared the interest of the accused to be biased, complaining to the policeman, commissioning the crime and being an investigative officer. There was no legal prohibition, unless he was subjected to prejudice in any way, alleging that the Chemical Examiner had not been inspected and the prosecution had failed to disclose who killed Mersella. Who was included in the FIR and who was assigned to take the sample in the Franzic Science Laboratory was flawless. If the author of this report has not been regularly examined as a witness to the prosecution, section 101010, CRPC, shall be referred to the appropriate report female advocates from Kotri lawyer