Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD AHMED versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (PUNJAB), LAHORE

Section 21 and 22 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appeal for submission of balance sale price before constitutional petition, in setting the date for such deposit Failure, correction of gross error in the use of revision jurisdiction. Through the Board of Revenue Trial Court, filed in favor of the plaintiff and allowed the balance sale price to be submitted, the appellate court, determined by the trial court, dismissed the appeal and dismissed the appeal as per the order of the order. done. , The extension time was up to 31 1 1990 which had already expired 55 days before the extension order was approved. The pre-emptor tried to rectify the error through a review request but the appellate court did not correct the error. The error was allowed in the use of the amended jurisdiction presented to the Board of Revenue and the error was corrected by the appellate court, such part of the decree, dated 27th, 1990 1990, Legally economical, ineffective, and lacking in law, the Appellate Court set the wrong date, using the principle of extension of the right to offer. Which should have been corrected by himself instead of supporting his wrong order. This appellate error was properly corrected by the Appellate Court High Court's denial of interference with the Board of Revenue's order in exercising the jurisdiction, the constitutional application was dismissed immigration advocate from Feroz Walla lawyer