Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH VICE-PRESIDENT, ZONAL CHIEF versus EFFEF INDSUTRIES LIMITED

Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Sections 12 9 (4) of the Ordinance 1997 and 10 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OX, RR 6 and 12 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and 14 Case for Recovery of Bank Debt On 14-14, 2000, the defendant filed an order for ex parte proceedings against some defendants when the court did not appear in court on 8 7 2000 under section 12 of the banking companies. Was. Loans, Advances, Credits and Finance) Act, 1997 was filed under Sections 5 and 14 of the Examination Act 1908, which was raised by the respondent, as this case was not properly established. So, summons could not be summoned to prosecute and defend the case. It did not apply to the validity under section 12 of the Act because no decision was issued against the plaintiff's Banking Court under which the previous order was issued under the Civil Code of Conduct, 1908. That the present applicant Ion filed under the provisions of the CPC's respondent did not insist that he was not summoned nor any reason for his non-submission. Was shown or there was no reason not to file a leave application for defense. On finding that the defendant had not yet filed a leave application to defend the case, the defendant's request was not considered sufficient to set aside any previous order within the parameters of the law. Can go / Delayed request for condolences showed ground top advocate from Kashmore lawyer