MST. RUKHSANA BASHIR versus HABIB BANK LTD
Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance 1997 Section 9 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 29 and 49 Wrongful possession of a vehicle suit for recovery of damages, Plaintiff's vehicle misappropriated on 23 Seized by the bank from. In 1997, 11.22000 was filed by the plaintiff without any law enforcement action for damages, which was rejected by the Banking Court under the provisions of Article 29 of the Limitation Act, 1908. That the provisions of Article 49 of the Limitation Act 1908 were applicable and that the case was within time Article 49 of the Limitation Act 1908 and Article 29 of the Act did not apply to the case filed by the plaintiff and approved by the Banking Court. The order made was kept separate. And a remand was obtained for the decision of the case according to which the appeal was allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
