Find a Lawyer

MEHRAM SHAH versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAYYAH

After being convicted on the charge of forfeiting Article 4 514 and 433 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC), the trial court proceeded against the defendant under section 141414, CRPC and The guaranteed forfeiture has been forfeited by. Illegal and without jurisdiction because they were not presented with any show cause notice and in their absence the trial court granted the order, the evidence on the record proved that under section 514 The notice was issued, but the PC was granted bail by the trial court under litigation but they refused. Accepting his service even the rest of the bailiff knew about the proceedings against him, because up to that date he had been represented by a lawyer in the trial court, even if it was believed that the bail bail. If not, he knew of the action against him on the relevant bail date. Submitted to the accused nor requested by the trial court to be given time to present the accused before the court guaranteed it was under the legal obligation to fulfill his obligation under the bail bond presented by him and himself. After accepting his responsibility, he did not lie in his mouth that he was a poor man and could not pay the amount of the bond executed by him. Guaranteed bonds and guaranteed money collection, were accurate. Appropriate, and will not require any interference with legal and review female advocates from Lasbela lawyer