Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HUSSAIN RICE FACTORY, MANDI SHAH JEWANA THROUGH PARTNER versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT

Rice failed to cite any cause in the plaintiff's suit for the order of the CPC Plants O VII for Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R6 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 Limitation Exemption Accounts. However, the lawsuit was filed due to the negligence of the bank, the mortgaged stock was damaged, resulting in the sale of the auction at a very low price, therefore, the bank had to suffer at a lower price, the auction proceeded. Gone. 25 10 1988 and the case was filed by the plaintiff on 16 12 1996 which stated the exact details of the stock price and the price of the stock sold through the auction, thereby specifying the specific amount Shows the difference of It could be claimed with regard to the bank that in the present case there was no cause of action for the plaintiff and the suit was barred from limitation. Such restriction was done under Article 120 of the Act, 1908. Which began in the six year period from the date when the right to be filed for collection to the present case, when the auctioneer opened the warehouse and made a report about the contents of the collection and its contents. Also, when the auction was completed in October 1988, instead of filing a case by October 1994, the current case was filed on 16 12 1996, and Hush M, R 6, c there is no statement of meaning. At the time of the trial, which was present in the case, the trial court properly dismissed the case and the High Court refused to interfere with the decision and the order passed by the trial court's appeal was dismissed. Was famous high court advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer