Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF versus THE STATE

Sections 4 & 4 and ty 439 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) are guarantors in connection with the bond forfeiture applicants and they have implemented bail bonds in the meantime, up to the date after the hearing. During the hearing, the accused will be responsible for appearing in court. The trial accused, who was facing murder charges, fled at the end of the trial and the trial court confiscated the bonds and ordered the recovery of the bonds, Sorrentes argued. They are poor people and unable to pay the money in question and their guarantees are guaranteed. The accused accused of the lawsuit, it was illegal to pay a full fine, the trial court granted a reasonable time for illegal and irresponsible bail-outs which have been overturned, but they continue to fulfill their obligation to present the accused before the court. I was unsuccessful, unable to do the necessary work if the necessary things were poor and their finances were not correct. They should have taken on the responsibility they were unable to fulfill the guarantees, were legally subject to the bonds offered by them and the amount of the bonds and bonds offered by them. The reasons for the bail granted by the competent court, which were authorized by the court, were reasonable and legal and cannot be interfered with by the High Court. advocate from Darya Khan lawyer