Find a Lawyer

HASHIM versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The money received from the withdrawal has been dissolved on the basis of the marriage of his wife's father Khul Nakanama that his father's father has given Rs 95,000 to give his hand. The husband who received the money was by the husband that the family court did not order the refund of the money received by the father. The husband could not prove what benefits the wife received at the time of the marriage because the money was not received by the family court on the basis of no order for the return of the alleged benefit from the wife, by the wife herself. No illegal activity was committed \ The applicant failed to state which part of the evidence was not read or which piece of evidence was present. The Family Court had the power to dissolve the marriage as well as to settle and settle the marital rights lawsuit. The High Court refused to interfere with the family court's decision and decree, as it was not without legal law, the constitutional petition was dropped best law firms from Vehari lawyer