Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus UNION COUNCIL, NOORPUR

Sections 2 (xxii) and 88 (1) (b) (f) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Implementation of Service Tax on Constitutional Application Transport Vehicles, in the business of transporting coal from legitimate applicants to mines. busy. The trucks challenged the notification under which Union Council imposed a tax on coal-related union councils in its supplementary comments stating that service tax was not levied by any mine owner or leaseholder. , But it was imposed on transport vehicles that fall within local limits. Union Council and Transit Roads were used to link the corridors to the main road and to which the Union Council provided construction, repair and maintenance services, the local commission submitted a report stating that the road through the Union Council A very small portion of the road is being maintained and the bulk of the road was managed by people who claimed to own land mines and the aforementioned Road Union Council, which failed to operate, had any property related to the road. The recording of the title documents, too, failed to prove that the above mentioned by the Union Council No services have been covered for months was a \ Services Local description Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001, but was not in the definition of municipal services. Section 2 of the ordinance (xxii) and the definition of public roads were included in the definition of municipal services \ The Union Council could not pay for the function of which it was obligated to supply anything which was not on record. In the presence to show that the Union Council was providing any service, any kind best advocate from Kharian lawyer