Find a Lawyer

CITY SCHOOLS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE CANTT versus PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 2 (h) and 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) contract auction proceedings The applicant participated in the auction proceedings through the Privatization Commission even though the applicant was the highest bidder. Nevertheless, the auction was not confirmed by the commission and there was property. The commission decided not to re-auction, rather than auction the property, but the bank draft made by the applicant was canceled because the applicant's position was that the tender notice was a workable contract under the law and the property was once Was placed before the commission. Cannot be added to auction list. The correct test for the decision of the question was to ascertain whether the contract was made in a particular circumstance or not, and whether all the parties were in mind on all material terms and conditions. The property could be auctioned off. Before the sale process was finalized, the commission had never agreed to accept the bid offered by the applicant and never auctioned again, as it was enough that the commission was not willing to sell the property. Permission denied best law firms from Astore lawyer