Find a Lawyer

CITY SCHOOLS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE CANTT versus PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000 Sections 5, 23 and 25 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 2 (h) and Pakistan 10 of the Constitution (1973), Article 185 (3) of the contract auction proceedings made by the applicant through the Privatization Commission. Participated in the auction proceedings, though the applicant was still the highest bidder, the auction was not confirmed by the commission and the property auction was decided. The commission did not auction the property but The applicant's position was that the tender notices were valid under the law, enclosing the bank draft made by the applicant. The agreement was in force. The true test for the decision of this question was to determine if the agreement was reached in a particular circumstance, to ascertain whether the parties were of one mind to all material terms and conditions. Never agreed that the bid and re-auction offered by the applicant never took place, as it was enough to hold such commission the property was not willing to sell the privatization commission by finalizing the sale process. The first auction can be done by delisting a property from the pool best law firms from Chak 46 lawyer