Find a Lawyer

AMJAD ALI versus MESSRS M.C.B.

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Sections 12 and 21 of the Ordinance 1997 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, Twelfth, R1, for leave on application 425 There is a ban on the day. The Quotations Banking Court dismissed the applicants' requests to dismiss the former party order on 7-4000 and their appeals were also dismissed. 19 10 2000 Petitioners with requests for leave to plead with the petitioner for alleged contempt of court have filed a criminal action in connection with the alleged execution of documents. As defendants, the defendants were pending against the loan and the bank officer, who were each granted bail against cash security of Rs. 250,000, which they submitted and the court adjusted the court on 30 7 2001. Therefore, the applicants felt satisfied that the amount of the data had already been paid to the bank and there was no need to file an appeal. The Minal Case was passed on 30th 2001, which was set aside by the High Court, so there was no scope for it to be sufficient, no explanation was given as to who was the former applicant. The party decree was granted and why it was rejected on one side to compile their petitions, did not approach the Supreme Court within the time limit, and requests for contempt of delay were dismissed, as a result. However, important petitions were also dismissed on time and the appeal was denied. jobs for advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer