Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAMAN versus THE STATE

Section 10 (4), 10 (3) and 11 Definition of Evidence (XLV of 1860), Sections 354 A / 149, 452/34 and 148 Evidence. The ocular account of the accused's wrongdoing and his abduction was sustained and encouraged by the complainant in the residential quota of the complainant, and the recovery of broken bangles and evacuation of the crime from this place. Because of this, there was no previous hostility to the false allegations of the accused, which had a special role and role in the commission. The kidnapping offender was recovered from the possession of the accused, which led to the recovery of his torn clothing, the Chemical Examiner's report was positive, no witnesses were examined by the prosecution so that It may be revealed that the kidnapper was taken away. It was made public and such allegation was made during the investigation which was not proved by any other witness of the prosecution and the conviction of the accused under Section 354A / 149 was PPC. Under section 10 (4) of the Crime (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, the offenders of the accused were acquitted, changed to section 10 (3) of the said ordinance and the death sentence was reduced to imprisonment. ? It was alleged that he had only fired ineffectively, in which he was alleged to have been wrongly involved in being a relative of the main accused and accordingly he was acquitted on the benefit of the suspect. female advocates from Tarnol lawyer