Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 34, 460/34 and 411 definitions of the FIR were not listed in the FIR in any way as there was no purpose of the accused in the FIR prosecution. No independent witnesses were examined at the location by Eye. The witnesses did not see the suspect in any kind of injury to the deceased, and they only saw the suspects armed with weapons and hatcheries, which they did not prove to be the actual culprit, witnesses did not call the police station to file a report. Went neither. Did they go to the scene of the incident when the complainant heard only one firearm noise while the recovery of three offenses was recovered on the occasion Medical evidence did not support the prosecution's version The prosecution failed to examine the witness Who informed the complainant of the crime. The firearms specialist was not sent along with the weapons of the crime allegedly recovered from the accused, but the articles recovered from the accused for the encounter were of a modest nature. There was nothing on record to link the accused to the accused. Were, they were left in conditions immigration advocate from Madinah lawyer