HABIB BANK LIMITED versus NASIR SAEED
Section 3A, 17 and 24 of the Bank (Nationalization) Act (XIX of 1974), Section 5 and 6 Enforcement Application requesting the removal of the competence filed by the banking company against its tenant, the rent controller saying Denied that since the banking company was given national status, it was under the control of the federal government and that the request to be filed without the authority of the government was ineligible. Nationalization of the banking company's legitimacy will not affect its body corporate status and will continue to exist as a legal entity independent of the federal government's banking company. The body corporate was solely authorized to own and dispose of the property, and in this case the Rent Controller had committed a law error to deal with the way the law was enforced while excluding the removal request. The order of the rented controller was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Silanwala lawyer