Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE

Section 222, when the evidence was appreciated, occurred when the police post in the dark was 1/2 km away from the scene, but no one was present to file a report with the police and after investigation. An FIR was registered on the spot. The man, who claimed that he awoke after a firearm and saw the accused running away, did not see any weapon in the accused's complaint. The complainant did not mention in the FIR that he had fired the accused on the victim. But in cross-examination he had stated that he had seen the accused. The shooting from the pistol to the right of the complainant's head also led to several improvements, with prosecutors who were close relatives of the victim being residents of the locations 1 1/2 to 16 miles from the location of the incident. The presence of the prosecution witnesses stated that the location at the relevant time was not acceptable, that no person belonging to the adjoining houses was brought before the court nor all the prosecution witnesses had made the case. To amend their statements to strengthen their case against the accused. The complainant's daughter, who described the accused's wife as a defense witness in the courts, stated that the accused was intended to be in her home with her on the night of the incident, and the accused's younger sister was incompetent. There were relationships. Syed's sister never interrogated the police and the defendant's wife did not support her, saying that the prosecutor's story was not proven wrong and that the prosecution failed to fail due to doubts. ? Of the accused best advocate from Kunri lawyer