Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI

Sections 4, 20 and 22 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 and the Settlement of Displaced Property and Homelessness Act (XIV of 1975), Section 2 (2), for the management and disposal of available urban properties. Scheme, 1977 31 Settlement Scheme No. VIII, Para 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner transferred property to the applicant and the respondent Deputy Settlement Commissioner in the case of compromise, 30 197 1976, without payment. The transfer was canceled in favor of the applicant due to. On receipt of the order, on the 30th of 1976 1976, when the applicant learned of the approval of the order, on the restoration of the property from the transfer, on the restoration of the property from the applicant, the form under the Settlement Scheme for the administration and settlement of the available urban properties. Who applied to call him back. It was accepted by the Deputy Settlement Commissioner under the order of 266 1978, who not only returned the restoration order, the date of 30 197 1976 but in his capacity as Deputy Administrator (Outstanding Properties) separately. The filing of a revision petition against the rejection of this form before the Respondent's administration of the Form, ie, 26 6 1978, (Paragraph 31 of the Scheme for Administration of Outstanding Properties) and the disposal of available Urban Properties, 1977. , But did not challenge the order dated 26 197 1978, under which the order to restart on 30 197 1976 was reviewed by the Administrator (Outstanding Properties). Accepting the petition, the two orders passed on 26 6 1978 were set aside. According to the competence of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner and Deputy Administrator (Outstanding Properties) by the same officer, and the respondent best advocate from Feroz Watan lawyer