Section 42 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), section 17 (1) and 49 document, undocumented document interpretation Claim on the basis of such document, sale process in favor of the defendant in the interest of the defendant It was struck that his father executed the document in favor of the plaintiff's mother before the sale process, and on the basis of such document the sale process executed in favor of the defendants was illegal and liable. Which was rejected by both the courts respectively. In addition to the suit, the appeal of the plaintiff's document articles was a move that promised to take certain steps to fulfill the rights of the plaintiff's mother in the future. The statement was neither stated nor paid to the plaintiff's mother, nor was the plaintiff's dispute disputed, the property was held in favor of her mother, as also provided in the document. From the construction of the document, the construction of the document cannot conclude that it gave ownership or title to the plaintiff's mother. Only a promise that contained the promise of transfer of property in favor of the plaintiff's mother where the executor of the said promise did not comply, no document was given in favor of the mother's mother in this document. The plaintiff and the executive were not separated from the property / title in the property, even if the document was taken as an unauthorized document that conveyed the title and title, then it was registered under section 17 (1) of the Registration Act, 1908. ) Was registered under the Registration Act, 1908 as a non-registration effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
