Find a Lawyer

TARIQ IQBAL versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS THROUGH COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, LAHORE

Sections 169 and 201 of Pakistan Customs Act 1969 (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for sale of currencies Foreign currency was confiscated in the form of US dollars dollars The Supreme Court finally decided on the matter by the applicant. In favor of And the authorities were instructed to return the seized currency to the applicant authorities instead of refunding the US dollar, refunded the equivalent of the local currency, and that the authorities disputed the exchange rate when confiscated. It was reported that the foreign currency was sold seven years after it was seized. In the case of currency disposal under section 69 of the Customs Act, 69 69 201 of 201 201 with ??? was obliged to provide care in the case where the authorities failed to do so without justice. ? Therefore, the authorities were obliged to hand over or equal the amount of foreign currency to the applicant at the current exchange rate in the local currency at the date when this amount was actually paid to the applicant, in the present case, the relevant The officials had acted negligently and ignorantly of their duties, thus directing the High Court to initiate a departmental inquiry and assign individual responsibility which would be dealt with under the rules of performance and discipline. High Court directs further authorities to recover damages from concerned officials to the department Seize foreign currency sale from applicant without legality, constitutional application is allowed accordingly jobs for advocates from Sudhnoti lawyer