Find a Lawyer

UNITED BANK LIMITED versus MESSRS A.I. BROTHERS (PVT.) LIMITED

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Rules and Orders of Sections 9, 10 and 12 of the High Court (Lahore) of the Ordinance 1997, Volume V, Chapter 3, R8 Sindh Chief Court Rules (O Section) Ex. Termination of Defendants by One of the Fair Banking Courts on 18 8 2000 under Part Decree, Arrangement for Illegal Procedure Section 10, Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Reinvestment of Credit and Financial Affairs) Act (XV of 1997) And demanded that the case be dismissed on 19 2 2001. Based on the restoration of the previous decree and application that both the respondent and his lawyer respectively in Rawalpindi and Islamabad were not notified about the hearing of the petition on 18 8 2000 or 19 I 2001 and only before that information Notices were not received about. The hearing was issued, Sindh High Court Rules (O Section) High Court (Lahore) rules and regulations were silent on the notice of notification to any party or lawyer established under Karachi Rule 8 of Rule 5. In the case of sending such parties by registered post (AD), the date of the specified package is clear on the appellate side providing the application or the Karachi resident is usually not his lawyer in the present court of such process. The High Court consistently acted on the original aspect of the notice. The defendants were released for these hearings when the matter was not adjourned until a fixed date, so the court did not set aside $ 8000 for the reason when no notice was issued to the defendant or his lawyer. Was made when the matter was settled for final hearing. Not issuing notice to notify the lawyer of non-submission hearing on 19 1 2001 attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gaggo Mandi lawyer