ABADAN FARIDOON ABADAN versus THE STATE
Before the arrest of Section 498 National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 10 and 3A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), he was the director of the company at the relevant time and acquired his controlling shares, Therefore, it should not be said at this stage that he did not benefit from the misappropriated money which the government was missing from the alleged wrongdoing in the reference, due to the non-bailable warrant, the trial court did not return. Was. It was a crime to refrain from serving any court-issued process under Section 31A of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999, which could be punishable by imprisonment - up to three years in prison. Therefore, he should have surrendered himself before the trial court. The charge was unsuccessful; in the circumstances, the bail was not entitled to pre-arrest. The bail application was accordingly dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Padidan lawyer
