Find a Lawyer

MST. ZOHRA versus NABI BUX

Sections 184 (4) (b) (i) Sections 161, 164 and 172 of the Government Land Colonization (Sindh) Act (v. 1912), Sections 15 and 30 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (BB) The suit was granted by the Authority in the interest of the petitioners in section 9 and 115 suits in the year 1960 for the acquisition of jurisdiction of the civil court and on payment of full value, it was filed in the year 1969 for the respondent. Before the Additional Commissioner, who had canceled such grant on 25 7 1969, the Board of Revenue had submitted a request for review in the interest of the applicants. The civil suit was filed for judgment, the case was dismissed due to lack of trial, which was upheld by the appellate court certifying that the petitioner was retained. The suit was granted under the provisions of the Revenue Code, 1879, which was in force at that time, the Sindh Land Revenue Code, 1879, was repealed by the West Pakistan's 1844. N Land Revenue Act, 1967 for former applicants. In the interest of the plaintiff, the plaintiff paid the full value of the land before the commencement of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, thus, on the basis of section 184 (4) (b) (i), To be the owner of the aforesaid land and by virtue of the reference has been obtained all property rights under the Government Land (Sindh) Colonization Act, 1912, both the courts mistakenly found that in this case The civil court has no jurisdiction. In the interest of the applicants the order of cancellation of the grant in favor of the predecessor did not face any illegal proceedings as follows. divorce advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer