AKRAM KHAN versus THE STATE
The West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance 1965 Section 13, evidence of the location of the evidence was not related to the accused nor was he present at the relevant time and was recovered from another person's house. The alleged weapons and ammunition were recovered. Weapons were not dispatched to test whether such weapons were in working condition, should at least be sent to a coach to determine the bore of the weapon, which was the duty of the prosecutor, `` Such an obligation prosecution failed to prove its evidence. The prosecution of an accused is beyond doubt and his case is full of contradictions and improvements. The benefit should go to the accused and, by trial, he is entitled to prove and convict the accused as a gross crime. Was given and acquitted of the charge. Against it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Malakand lawyer
